<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sneak&#8217;s images next to its ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/google-sneaks-images-next-to-its-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/google-sneaks-images-next-to-its-ads/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:27:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan from thrusites, London</title>
		<link>http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/google-sneaks-images-next-to-its-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan from thrusites, London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/google-sneaks-images-next-to-its-ads/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Actually, I don&#039;t see any images near the advertisement when I search for &quot;christmas&quot; (I used google.com, gl=us). Anyway, there is a difference between what many webmasters used to do and what Google have done.

First, Google doesn&#039;t show more than 1 image (1 repetitive image is still 1 image) and they don&#039;t seem to be &quot;click-willing&quot; unlike the screenshot which you published above.

This is my personal feeling...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t see any images near the advertisement when I search for &#8220;christmas&#8221; (I used google.com, gl=us). Anyway, there is a difference between what many webmasters used to do and what Google have done.</p>
<p>First, Google doesn&#8217;t show more than 1 image (1 repetitive image is still 1 image) and they don&#8217;t seem to be &#8220;click-willing&#8221; unlike the screenshot which you published above.</p>
<p>This is my personal feeling&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google sneaking images next to ads part II &#124; Joe Whyte - Seo Consulting - Rockyfied</title>
		<link>http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/google-sneaks-images-next-to-its-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Google sneaking images next to ads part II &#124; Joe Whyte - Seo Consulting - Rockyfied</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/google-sneaks-images-next-to-its-ads/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] I mean, it looks like you guys already break your own rules: http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/&#8230;xt-to-its-ads/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mean, it looks like you guys already break your own rules: <a href="http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/&#8230;xt-to-its-ads/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/&#8230;xt-to-its-ads/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

