Joe Whyte - Digital Marketer » SEV http://www.joe-whyte.com Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:21:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 en hourly 1 Google sneaking images next to ads part II http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/google-sneaking-images-next-to-ads-part-ii/ http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/google-sneaking-images-next-to-ads-part-ii/#comments Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:40:47 +0000 joe.whyte http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/google-sneaking-images-next-to-ads-part-ii/ I found a forum post from Josh (SitePoint Forum Leader). It was a very GOOD post in my opinion. He took great measures to digg deeper on Googles postion regarding placing its OWN images next to ads. See original Forum post here:

Josh’s  email to Google said and I quote -

Regarding your blog post “clarifying” the image placement next to ads here: http://adsense.blogspot.com/2006/12/…nt-policy.html

While it was certainly clearer, it wasn’t clear.

Statements like this are very ambiguous and confusing to publishers:

“You can definitely place Google ads on pages containing images — just make sure that the ads and images are not arranged in a way that could easily mislead or confuse your visitors. For example, if you run a stock photography site with a catalog of thumbnail images, don’t line the ads up with the thumbnails in a way that could be misleading. Consider using a full border around your ads or changing your ad colors, for example.”

So wait, does that mean if you use ads with a full border or different background color you can have thumbnails? If you offset the thumbnails so they don’t line up exactly with the ads is that okay? Your examples certainly don’t answer those questions, either (one implies it’s a no-no to put images related to the products sold in the ads, the other implies that it is bad to make your ads look like content links–but what if your adsense blocks are the only things with thumbnails on your site, is it then permitted?)

Do you have any better answers? This policy clarification still seems to leave things VERY subjective and ambiguous.

Also, given the number of people who are doing this, and how effective it apparently is, why don’t you guys just offer thumbnail ads to ADVERTISERS. Then they pick the thumbnail on their ads and everyone is happy. I’m sure you’ve gotten that suggestion numerous times.

I mean, it looks like you guys already break your own rules: http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/18/…xt-to-its-ads/

-Josh

I love his email. Way to go JOSH!! Here is what GOOGLE HAD TO SAY!!!

Hi Josh,

Thank you for your email.

I understand that you have questions about the example we’ve provided. We’re trying to convey that users who naturally have smaller images on their sites (for instance, the stock photography site we used as an example) should still feel free to place ads on their sites, as long as they don’t try to associate the images and ads in any way. The provided suggestions were general suggestions that referred to our example, and do not apply to other sites.

Regarding your second question – if a site does not have thumbnail sized images for some other reason, then there’s really no circumstances under which images should be added and placed near Google ads.

We appreciate your suggestion for allowing advertisers to offer thumbnail images. While this feature isn’t currently available, I’m happy to pass along your comments to our engineering and product teams. Please also feel free to submit any future suggestions through our online form at http://google.com/adsense_features_email .

Sincerely,

Stephanie
The Google AdSense Team

I suggest my readers check out this forum post as there are going to be a lot of opinions going on over at sitepoint ;-) . IMO I think Google is taking the easy way out. Yes they do explain themselves and I GUESSSSS because its christmas they have a REASON to put these images next their ads but seriously how close are they pushing the line on this?????

Random Posts

]]> http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/google-sneaking-images-next-to-ads-part-ii/feed/ 6 Joe Whyte Mentioned on Web Pro News! http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/joe-whyte-mentioned-on-web-pro-news/ http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/joe-whyte-mentioned-on-web-pro-news/#comments Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:17:05 +0000 joe.whyte http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/joe-whyte-mentioned-on-web-pro-news/ I was doing some SEV (search engine vanity) today and I noticed that Joe Lewis from Web Pro News decided to do an interesting post about a topic that has been widely discussed in 2006 which is Google’s Supplemental Results. I recently did a post over at lunarpages about “Google Poo” and during my SEV I found a post on Web Pro News quoting me. Needless to say I was flattered and Joe Lewis wrote a great article about Google supplemental results and I recomend everyone checking out his article. I am going to have to put you in my news reader JOE!

Merry Christmas!!!

Random Posts

]]> http://www.joe-whyte.com/2006/12/24/joe-whyte-mentioned-on-web-pro-news/feed/ 1